17.    STREET NAME CHANGE - GREENVIEW AVENUE

CHANGEMENT DE NOM DE RUE – AVENUE GREENVIEW

 

 

Committee recommendation as amended

 

That Council approve that the City provide signage at the intersections of Greenview Avenue and Don Street indicating the house numbers on the Greenview Avenues.

 

 

Recommandation modifiÉe du Comité

 

Que le Conseil municipal approuve que la Ville installe à l’intersection de l’avenue Greenview et de la rue Don des affiches qui indiquent les numéros des habitations qui seront construites sur l’avenue Greenview.

 

 

 

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Deputy City Manager's report (Planning and Growth Management) dated
29 July 2005 (ACS2005-PGM-BLD-0019).

 

2.         Extract of Draft Minute, 27 September 2005.

 



Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

29 July 2005 / le 29 juillet 2005

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Ned Lathrop, Deputy City Manager/

Directeur municipal adjoint

Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance 

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : Sandra Garnett, Manager, Legal and Service Integration

Building Services Branch/Services juridique et integration des services

Building Services/Direction des services du bâtiment

613-580-2424 x41544, sandra.garnett@ottawa.ca

 

Bay/Baie (7)

Ref N°: ACS2005-PGM-BLD-0019

 

 

SUBJECT:

STREET NAME CHANGE - GREENVIEW AVENUE

 

 

OBJET :

CHANGEMENT DE NOM DE RUE – AVENUE GREENVIEW

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council enact a by-law to change the name of Greenview Avenue for that part located between Howe Street and the cul-de-sac south of Don Street to "Lorne Greene Way".

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement recommande au Conseil d’adopter un règlement pour changer le nom de l’avenue Greenview en ce qui a trait à la portion qui se trouve entre la rue Howe et le cul-de-sac au sud de la rue Don au nom « voie Lorne Greene ».

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

On January 12, 2005, City Council approved a work program directing that a number of existing street names be changed to ensure, as a partner of the Public Emergency Reporting Services (PERS) 911 program, a safe environment with clear street names to optimize way finding and effective emergency response.  Greenview Avenue is one of the initial streets identified as a priority for remedial action.

 

Greenview Avenue is physically divided with each section not readily visible or directly accessible from the other section (Reference Document 1).  Approximately 30 years ago, with the reconfiguration of Greenview Avenue to provide direct access between Carling Avenue and Britannia Park, the original northerly section of Greenview Avenue between Howe Street and the just south of Don Street became a cul-de-sac.  While Don Street links the two sections of Greenview Avenue, this section is limited to bus access only.  The original north section of Greenview is therefore, not accessible from Carling Avenue.  Vehicles must access this section via Richmond Road, Britannia Road and Don Street.  In response to concerns that the existing situation is presenting a safety hazard through potential emergency service response delays and inconvenience for the public attempting to locate specific addresses adjacent to the two sections of Greenview Avenue, this issue is submitted for consideration and resolution.

 

Recommendation

 

The Department and emergency services have received a number of complaints that emergencies in the area have been negatively impacted by the division of this roadway and the resulting confusion.  The division of the street is not common knowledge to the general public or services dispatched from outside the immediate area.

 

To develop the best course of action in this regard, the approved guidelines for changing street names were applied (Reference Document 2).  The approved weighting criteria states: "that the accepted principle objective when name changes are necessary is to impose minimal impact on the least number of individuals and businesses that would be affected.  When the number of residents/businesses are effectively equal, other evaluation factors would be considered and weighed for final comparison".  In this case, the section that would be least impacted is the north section and therefore this portion is recommended for a street name change.

 

A petition signed by 11 residents of the north section indicated that the owners would prefer to not change the name primarily because the street was named in commemorative recognition of "Lorne Greene", the actor, who as a youth resided on the street.  (Petition with historical background on Lorne Greene available.)

 

On June 20, 2005, Councillor Cullen hosted a public meeting at which a second petition was received, signed by 317 residents living on the reconfigured south section who support the Department's rationale for selecting the north section and affirmed their opposition to a name change for the south section given the greater impact.  A consensus on the issue was not achieved.

 

The Department, therefore, in support of the Council approved guidelines and objective to ensure minimum disruption while improving way-finding and reducing confusion, recommends to rename the north section, as indicated in the historical reference of the first petition, to "Lorne Greene Way".

 

 


CONSULTATION

 

A letter dated April 8, 2005, was provided to the affected residents on the north section (adjacent to the park) explaining the rationale for a name change and the process to implement that change.  Owners and occupants were offered the opportunity to choose one of two optional names that relate to the area, i.e. the natural extension of "Howe Street" or "Pier Street" relating to a historical pier that was located in Britannia Park.  Alternatively, to circulate a petition to solicit majority support for another name acceptable under the guidelines.

 

The petition signed by 11 of the 13 residents living adjacent to the north section of Greenview Avenue provided the following specific rationale in opposition to a name change for this section:

 

 

The petition signed by 317 residents living on the south section of Greenview provided the following specific rationale in support of the Departmental position and opposed to a name change for this section:

 

 

Given that the residents on the north section did not in their petition formally recommend "Lorne Greene" as a preferred replacement name, the residents were notified by letter dated June 28, 2005 that additional time was provided to circulate a second petition to consider/confirm either "Lorne Greene" or an alternate name as the preferred name should their street name be changed.

 

One response was received that reiterated opposition to the name change.  Their concern is the personal family attachment to the street name with parents having lived in one of the original cottages since 1954.  The respondent also indicated that if the name must change, it should relate to the park and trees, and that Council should consider: White Pines Way, Sunrise, Sunset Haven, Pine Green Street or Green Pine Street.  Without a majority consensus from the affected community, the Department was unable to consider these names.

 

The legislated advertising of Council's intent to consider the street name change was published 14 days prior to the Planning and Environment Committee meeting.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Two street sign blades will need to be replaced at an estimated cost of $200, charges for fabrication and installation will be charged to the Public Works and Services Traffic and Parking Street Sign Operating Maintenance 132523.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location Plan

Document 2      Street Name Change Guidelines

 

Available on Request:

 

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Planning and Growth Management Department to notify the emergency services, the primary utility companies, IT, Government and identified business agencies of Council's decision.

 

Office of the City Solicitor to ensure the by-law is enacted and registered in accordance with the Recommendation.

 

Public Works and Services to arrange for the manufacture and installation of required street name signs on request by the Planning and Growth Management Department.

 


Document 1

 

Location Plan

 

                                                                                

LOCATION MAP / Plan de revision

Street Name Anomalies / Anomalies des noms de rues

Greenview Ave.

 

 

 
 


PRODUCED BY /Produit par                                                                                            

      Planning and Growth Management Department/

Service de l'Urbanisme et de la Gestion de la Croissance

 

Insert File Number                            03-1382-L

 


                 CO\03\SIGNS\NOR50.DGN

 


2004-09-09

                 REVISION DATE    DE RÉVISION

Document 2

 

Street Name Change Guidelines                                                                                                                        

 

PROCESS FOR STREET NAMES/NUMBERING

ANOMALIES REVIEW

 

In the establishment and maintenance of clear unique property identification, the Building Services Branch of Planning and Growth Management will review and resolve addressing concerns identified by the public and emergency services based on established criteria inclusive of a public consultation process (detailed below), when street name/numbering changes are required.

 

Identified concerns that qualify for review include any street or combination of streets that cause confusion for general way-finding and/or create a potential delay in the provision of emergency services.  Examples include:

 

 

The factors, as priorized below, are considered when evaluating identified concerns.  These were developed in consultation with the public and subsequently endorsed by the Transition Board and approved by City Council as part of the duplicate names project:

 

 

Weighting Criteria

 

The accepted principle objective when name changes are necessary is to impose minimial impact on the least number of individuals and businesses that would be affected.  Where the number of residents and/or businesses are effectively equal, other evaluation factors would be considered and weighed for final comparison.  During the duplicate names project, the comments received from the public on the proposed method of evaluation indicated some preferred that the weighting be based solely on historical significance.  When tested, it was concluded that a decision based on historical significance only would give unfair advantage in situations where other factors need to be taken into consideration.  For example, one street name may have been in existance for many years but the street services only a few residents, while a second street of the same name services numerous residents and businesses where a name change would impose significant disruption. e.g., Queen Street, Richmond vs Queen Street, Ottawa.  The evaluation must have the flexibility to filfill the principle objective and all other factors.

 

Application:

 

 

Classification:

 

High Priority for Remedial Action                                                                      Value Rating

 

§        Similar/exact sounding names with the same suffix but spelled differently, with or without duplicate civic numbers (Dayton Crescent/Deighton Crescent).                                                        10

 

Remedial Action Would Improve Clarity

 

 

Replacement Names:

 

 

Those directly affected plus all emergency and major public/private sector contacts will be notified of the change and the effective date.

 

Public Consultation Process:

 

  1. The Department will contact affected individuals/businesses in writing to explain the identified concern, the process to resolve such issues and the method for public involvement in determining the replacement street name.

 

  1. Two optional street names will be offered.  The list of available street names maintained by the City and names previously identified by the various heritage groups will determine the two optional names.  Also included will be a petition form (Document 5) so that individuals or groups wishing to pursue an alternate acceptable name, may obtain majority support from the affected owner/occupants.  The optional name or petition name with the strongest majority support will be the  name recommended by the Department for consideration by Council.

 

  1. A report with a recommendation for a specific name change will be submitted to the Planning and Environment Committee and Council for approval.  A summary of the public input, a list of the suggested names and the petition with the greatest support will be included.

 

  1. Following enactment of the implementing by-law, notification will be provided to the affected owner/occupants and emergency/service agencies.  The implementation date will coincide with the printing of the next telephone book.  The date established will provide sufficient time for individuals/businesses to notify personal and business contacts.  To offset potential costs that may be incurred by those affected, the effective date will be delayed for a minimum of six months to allow businesses to exhaust existing stationery.

 

Replacement street signs will be installed on the effective date of the new street name.



            STREET NAME CHANGE - GREENVIEW AVENUE

CHANGEMENT DE NOM DE RUE – AVENUE GREENVIEW

ACS2005-PGM-BLD-0019                                                                     BAY/BAIE (7)

 

Vice-Chair Feltmate chaired this item.

 

D. Jacobs, Arlene Gregoire, Director, Building Services, and Don Brousseau, Senior Policy Officer, Legal and Service Integration Division, appeared before the Committee with respect to departmental report dated 29 July 2005.

 

The Committee heard from the following delegations:

 

Cyril Winter referred to the map of streets in the Greenview area.  The extension of Don physically provides a link to the odd numbered side of Greenview.  Contrary to what is stated, it is not divided; but it is more appropriate to say it is “branched” into a boulevard.  Secondly, the report states the odd numbered side (older section) of Greenview is a cul-de-sac, which it is not.  It is bound by Don and Howe.  The only section of a cul-de-sac services one house.  The street is accessible by Carling via an access lane that is part of Greenview.  This issue arose because of a safety concern and due to errors contained in the report, he asked for reconsideration.  A directional sign would alleviate safety concerns.

 

Harry Schep attempted to clarify comments in the report, which states Greenview was identified as a priority for remedial action.  This all came about through an accident at 104 Greenview, with an ambulance delayed because there was no number.  Identification problems have since been rectified through signage.  Residents have lived on the street for 40 years and there has never been a safety issue.  The new numbers and signs in the area, as a result of the ambulance situation, is the appropriate approach to simplify the situation.  The ratings hinge on the physical disconnection.  The City imposed the bus link for no real reason that he could ascertain.  The report and rationale for the name change are faulty.

 

Bryan Parlour advised that residents of the section to be changed do not want the change to take place and want PEC to reject the change and maintain the status quo.  Echoed previous comments that there is no safety hazard.  Residents do not believe the minor inconvenience is significant enough to inflict a street name change.  Paramedics have said it is not a safety issue for them to find the street.  If it is not an issue for us, why is it an issue for City Council?  Preferences of street residents should take precedence over policy issues.

 

Gina Taggart Budde, President, Board of Directors, The Britannia Condominium Corporation 68, represented 317 residents that live in 212 units in the condominium; some have lived there for over 30 years; and, provided a written submission, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk.  Plans for the building and the Greenview name have existed since 1973.  A 14-page petition was sent to PEC through Mr. Brousseau’s office and contained 258 names; many residents were away or not at home when the petition was canvassed.  Numerous emails have also been received by Mr. Brousseau, Councillor Cullen and Ms. Ferrari; she represented many residents and there was a large turnout at the public meeting at the Ron Kolbus Lakeside Gardens Centre (RKLGC).  These residents oppose the renaming of the section of Greenview that extends from Carling to RKLGC (the long continuous uninterrupted section) since that portion of the street has a large number of residents.  In addition the change would affect others as thousands of residents access the facilities in the area (West Ottawa Tennis Club, Children’s Safety Village and the RKLGC).  There would be an incredible cost and inconvenience to a large number of residents who live in the area.  Renaming the northern section, with 11 homes would be more appropriate, definitely more logical and certainly more cost-effective for the majority involved.  She did regret those residents who would be inconvenienced if a compromise cannot be arrived at.  In summary, she requested PEC follow its precedent of changing the name of the portion of the street with the least number of residents.

 

Councillor Cullen sympathized with the 13 long-term residents of the original Greenview, but there are two distinct streets.  The original Greenview, unfortunately, is separated by the extension of Don, which is bus-only access and designed to protect the community from any overflow parking from Britannia Park.  The original Greenview was in existence when the area was developed; the long Greenview came about through the redevelopment of the Park and the Condominium that faces Carling that should have had a Carling address.  There was a problem with Lakeside Gardens having a Carling address, with residents trying to access the polling station; it created confusion and the Council of the day chose to rename the entire section Greenview.  The policy states that for safety reasons the distinctiveness must be resolved.  The law of larger numbers means that ultimately the original portion would be renamed.  There was public consultation and 13 homes on the original portion of Greenview rejected all ideas and want to retain the original name.  The staff recommendation to change one or the other is valid (and brought to PEC’s attention a newspaper article).  There is no desire to have another tragedy.  Lorne Greene did live on the original Greenview and had an influence on the name since that was not the original name when the subdivision was constructed; hence the proposal for Lorne Greene Way.

 

Mr. Brousseau referred to the recently approved Harmonized Addressing By-Law and guidelines set out therein.  Council also approved the anomalies report in January that spoke to 290 identified concerns the City would attempt to resolve over the years with this as an initial step on the first ½ dozen this year.  Staff is aware of the problems and constantly under pressure from Emergency Services (EPS) to resolve anomalies, receiving more weekly.

 

In response to Councillor Holmes, Mr. Brousseau explicated it is not quite correct that ambulance crews did not have a problem; the paramedics were attempting to reassure residents that “we’ll find you”, but EPS has stressed this is a concern and want it resolved.  Signing, with numbers, would not be EPS’s first choice.

 

A/Chair Feltmate received confirmation that emergency vehicles can access bus routes.

 

On the departmental recommendation, copied below:

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council enact a by-law to change the name of Greenview Avenue for that part located between Howe Street and the cul-de-sac south of Don Street to “Lorne Greene Way”.

 

                                                                                                LOST

 

YEAS(3):         Councillors A. Cullen, M. Bellemare, G. Bédard

NAYS (4):       Councillors J. Harder, G. Hunter, D. Holmes, P. Feltmate

 

Moved by Councillor A. Cullen:

 

That the City provide signage at the intersections of Greenview Avenue and Don Street indicating the house numbers on the Greenview Avenues.

 

CARRIED as amended with Councillor G. Bédard dissenting