4.         FUEL EFFICIENCY - RESPONSE TO MOTION 39/17

 

RENDEMENT DU CARBURANT – RÉPONSE À LA MOTION N39/17

 

committee recommendations as amended

 

That Council approve:

 

1.         Receive for information the Eco-Driving Policy and direct staff to incorporate it into the Corporate Policies, by referring to the idling bylaw;

 

2.         Direct staff to continue with options to reduce the amount of CO2 gases being emitted by City-owned vehicles as part of the Fleet Emission Reduction Strategy in Q1 2009.

 

 

Recommandations modifiées du comité

 

Que le Conseil approuve :

 

1.         d’approuver la politique de conduite écologique et de demander au personnel de l’intégrer aux politiques municipales;

 

2.         de demander au personnel de poursuivre avec les options visant à réduire la quantité de CO2 émise par les véhicules appartenant à la Ville dans le cadre de la Stratégie générale de réduction des émissions du parc de véhicules au cours du premier trimestre de 2009.

 

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Deputy City Manager’s report (Public Works and Services and Planning, Transit and the Environment) dated 7 October 2008 (ACS2008-PTE-DCM-0006).

 

2.         Extract of Draft Minute, 15 October 2008.


Report to/Rapport au :

 

Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

07 October 2008 / le 07 octobre 2008

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe,

Planning, Transit and the Environment/Urbanisme, Transport en commun et Environnement 

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : R.G. Hewitt, Deputy City Manager/Directeur municipal adjoint,

Public Works and Services/Services et Travaux publics

 

Contact/Personne-ressource: Michael Murr, Manager/Gestionnaire, Strategic Initiatives and Business Plan/Initiatives stratégiques et planification opérationnelle

(613) 580-2424, 25195 Michael.Murr@ottawa.ca

 

Contact/Personne-ressource: Gary Craig, Manager/Gestionnaire, Strategic Initiatives and Business Plan/Initiatives stratégiques et planification opérationnelle

(613) 580-2424, 19037 Gary.Craig@ottawa.ca

 

City Wide/à l'échelle de la Ville

Ref N°: ACS2008-PTE-DCM-0006

 

 

SUBJECT:

FUEL EFFICIENCY - RESPONSE TO MOTION 39/17

 

 

OBJET :

RENDEMENT DU CARBURANT – RÉPONSE À LA MOTION N39/17

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend Council:

 

1.                  Receive for information the Eco-Driving Policy and direct staff to incorporate it into the Corporate Policies;

 

2.                  Receive for information the implications and potential impacts of the options required to reduce fuel consumption of City-owned vehicles by 25 per cent and refer this report for consideration in the 2009 Budget process; and

 

3.                  Direct staff to continue with options to reduce the amount of CO2 gases being emitted by City-owned vehicles as part of the Fleet Emission Reduction Strategy in Q1 2009.

 

RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil :

 

1.         d’approuver la politique de conduite écologique et de demander au personnel de l’intégrer aux politiques municipales;

 

2.         de prendre connaissance du présent rapport concernant les conséquences et les répercussions possibles des options visant à réduire la consommation de carburant de 25 p. 100 par les véhicules appartenant à la Ville et de référer le présent rapport aux fins d’examen dans le cadre du processus budgétaire de 2009; et

 

3.         de demander au personnel de poursuivre avec les options visant à réduire la quantité de CO2 émise par les véhicules appartenant à la Ville dans le cadre de la Stratégie générale de réduction des émissions du parc de véhicules au cours du premier trimestre de 2009.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

At the June 25, 2008, meeting of Council, staff were directed through Motion 39/17 to develop an Eco-Driving Policy for submission to the Transportation Committee by October 2008; study potential opportunities to reduce fuel usage by 25 per cent; and, proceed with options to reduce CO2 gas emissions.  The motion states:

 

1.   THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that staff develop an Eco-Driving policy for submission to the Transportation Committee by October 2008 that will result in the most fuel effective uses of City vehicles, including items such as type of vehicle, planning the route, using air conditioning sparingly, proper tire inflation, avoiding idling, driving within speed limits, not having jackrabbit starts and hard braking.  Until the policy is finalized that staff be encouraged to use such fuel efficiency practices.

     

2.   BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager direct management in all City branches, through consultation with staff in each branch and with the public if there is an impact on service levels, to immediately undertake measures to reduce fuel usage and other use of petroleum based products with an overall goal to reduce usage by at least 25 per cent, and report back through the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee on a quarterly basis on the fuel savings that have been achieved and on those that will be implemented in the next quarter;

 

3.   BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 2009 budget contain ongoing measures to annualize and improve on fuel savings and the subsequent reduction in CO2 gases.

 

This report is intended to propose a City of Ottawa Eco-Driving Policy and to provide the framework for implementation.  Secondly, this report will provide for information the implications of reducing fuel consumption by 25 per cent and will highlight efforts to reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions.

 

Since amalgamation, Fleet Services Branch, in partnership with every City branch requiring vehicles, has implemented a number of environmentally friendly driving initiatives.  The Eco-Driving Policy integrates and formalizes these initiatives along with options created as a result of Council direction (Motion 39/17).

 

The intent of the new policy is to provide guidelines that will result in the most fuel effective use of City vehicles, and address issues such as vehicle type, route planning, air conditioning usage, proper tire inflation, idling, and driving within speed limits.

 

As well, Council referred to staff the investigation of options for immediately undertaking measures to lower fuel usage and petroleum based products with an overall goal of reducing consumption by at least 25 per cent.  The implications of moving forward with a 25 per cent reduction are outlined in this report.

 

This report contains, as per Council direction, preliminary information regarding the potential opportunities that could be achieved within the 2009 Budget regarding ongoing measures to annualize and improve on fuel savings and the subsequent reduction in CO2 emissions.

 

Currently, the City is undertaking a number of initiatives to reduce the amount of fuel required by municipal and transit fleet vehicles, including the introduction of hybrid buses.  As well, Fleet Services is working on implementing the fleet components of the Auditor General report recommendations that will produce fuel and efficiency savings. 

 

Fleet Services is also focused on procurement, and is striving to identify and purchase the most cost-effective fuel-efficient vehicle models available, while ensuring that service levels are not jeopardized.  Within this envelope, fuel efficiency ratings are identified so that vehicles meet certain requirements to be considered for purchase.  These fuel efficiency standards are based on industry best in-class for vehicle being purchased. 

 

Fleet Services has also begun to test promising new green vehicle technologies and is working with industry experts to accelerate development and large-scale adoption, while ensuring the vehicles fit within the City’s operational requirements.  For example, the municipal fleet contains several light duty electrical support vehicles for warehouse and similar operations; technology improvements are permitting substitution of internal combustion power to electrical power. Opportunities to increase the number of electric vehicles will be brought forward in the 2009 Fleet Emissions Reduction Strategy and Green Fleet Plan.

 

ANALYSIS

 

As it relates to Recommendation 1, the Eco-Driving Policy will help ensure all City owned and leased vehicles and equipment are operated in a fuel-efficient manner.  The objective of the policy is to provide driving guidelines for staff that may result in reduced fuel consumption, thereby reducing fuel costs to the City and simultaneously decreasing emissions.

 

Integration of Eco-Driving Policy Initiatives

 

Prior to the proposed Eco-Driving Policy, the City of Ottawa had a number of environmentally friendly initiatives to address the issues of fuel usage, Greenhouse Gas emissions, and to reduce operating expenditures.  Staff have integrated the existing fuel consumption initiatives and other policies into one document to be known as the Eco-Driving Policy attached as Document 1.

 

The Policy establishes a number of guidelines for staff.  For example, staff will be required to consider non-travel options such as e-mail, fax, teleconferencing or internal / external mail.  Staff will also be required to plan their route to minimize use.  When driving, staff will be required to avoid rush hour traffic if possible, reduce idling time and travel at the posted speed limit. 

 

The new Eco-Driving Policy will be integrated into a number of citywide policies such as the Employee Code of Conduct, Fuel Emission Strategy, and Corporate Vehicle and Equipment Idling Policy.  Staff training and awareness will be rolled into the City’s current training programs.

 

Currently, Fleet Services gathers fuel usage information and distributes reports to the branches on a monthly basis. The branches then use this data as a tool to help calculate budget requests, highlight operational trends, and provide records for issues related to efficiency and transparency.

 

The following Table 1 indicates current fuel usage.  In 2007, Transit Services (Buses, Para Transpo, Light Rail) accounted for approximately 80 per cent of total fuel usage, while the remaining municipal fleet accounted for 20 per cent of fuel usage (excluding Police Services).

 

Table 1

Service 

2007

2008 YTD (8 months)

 

 Total (litres)

% of Total

 Total (litres)

% of Total

Buses

39,645,555

76%

27,017,775

76%

ParaTranspo

1,844,356

4%

1,180,696

3%

Light rail (estimated quantity)

480,000

1%

320,000

1%

Municipal Total (excluding police)

 

Total

10,409,592

 

 

52,379,503

20%

7,280,672

 

 

35,459,343

20%

Related to Recommendation 2, due to low volumes of fuel consumption within the non-transit service vehicles, staff focused primarily on Transit Services to achieve significant fuel savings, as the remaining municipal fleet has a minimal impact on the 25 per cent goal.  For example, in the absence of transit service reductions, the City would have to park the entire municipal fleet to reach the 25 per cent goal.  It is important to note that all options and strategies will be considered to work towards the goal of 25 per cent, including those potential savings found within the municipal fleet.

 
Transit Fleet

 

As directed by Council within Recommendation 2, Table 2 below details a variety of options to reduce transit services by 25 per cent, in order to achieve a 25 per cent saving in fuel consumption for the City of Ottawa.

 

Table 2

 

Existing Situation

Reduced Service Scenario

 

AM Revenue kms

Service Reduction

Effect on

OC Transpo ridership

Area

Routes

AM Revenue kms

City-wide

13,580

 

10,190

-25%

-10 to -15%

Inside Greenbelt

6020

Remove: 123, 141, 142, 143, 144, 147, 179, 187, 194, 197

4430

-26%

 

 

Reduce frequency by 25% on all other routes

 

 

West

1750

Remove: 164, 165, 167

1350

-23%

 

 

Reduce frequency by 25% on all other routes

 

 

Southwest

950

Remove: 181, 186, 188

720

-25%

 

 

Reduce frequency by 25% on all other routes

 

 

Southeast

90

Remove: 45, 145

0

-100%

 

 

Reduce frequency by 25% on all other routes

 

 

East

2330

Remove: 137, 193

1840

-21%

 

 

Reduce frequency by 25% on all other routes

 

 

Transitway Routes

2440

Reduce frequency by 25% on all rapid transit routes

1840

-24%

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 illustrates the service reductions by geography to indicate how a 25 per cent overall reduction would affect each area of the city.  In each area, to achieve the directed savings, some routes would have to be cut completely (e.g. routes 123, 141, etc. inside the Greenbelt) while the others would operate 25 per cent less frequently. None of the Transitway routes (95, 96, 97, etc.) would be eliminated, but their frequency would be reduced by 25 per cent.

 

Revenue (or service) kilometres are the distance traveled by public transit vehicles while in service. In the reduced service scenario detailed in Table 2, non-revenue kilometres (for example, when the bus is driven back to the garage at the end of a run) could also be reduced, but that distance is somewhat marginal compared to the number of revenue kilometres traveled.

 

While Table 2 shows kilometres traveled during the morning only, the nature of the service reductions on each route would apply throughout the day. Thus, individual routes noted in the table would actually be removed in totality, while all other routes would have their frequency reduced by 25 per cent all day long.

 

If Council directs staff to reduce fuel usage by 25 per cent - through a reduction by 25 per cent of revenue (or service) kilometres[1] - there would likely be a decrease in public transit ridership of between 10 per cent and 15 per cent.  This would translate into a loss of 32,000 to 48,000 passengers per day.

 

Currently, OC Transpo relies on revenue for 50 per cent of its operating budget.  A loss in ridership of this magnitude would generate a substantial loss in revenue, which could further negatively impact the overall operations of the service.

 

Municipal Fleet

 

As per Council’s direction to identify Municipal Fleet fuel consumption, Table 3 illustrates the quantity of total fuel of municipal vehicles use compared to other branches.  For example, Surface Operations account for 55.5 per cent of the entire Municipal Fleet fuel consumption, however, if viewed within the overall City fuel consumption, this amount only accounts for less than 11 per cent of the City’s overall fuel consumption.

 

Table 3

 

 

Municipal Fuel Consumed January through July 2008

(Non-Transit Service Vehicles

20% of Total City Fuel Consumption)

 

 

 

Branch

Total Litres
Percentage

 

 

Surface Operations

3,821,436

55.51%

 

 

Solid Waste

610,157

8.86%

 

 

Paramedics

567,302

8.24%

 

 

WWS

529,646

7.69%

 

 

Fire

465,916

6.77%

 

 

TPO

327,588

4.76%

 

 

Bylaw

168,195

2.44%

 

 

RPAM

103,335

1.50%

 

 

Motor Pool

100,655

1.46%

 

 

Building Services

40,686

0.59%

 

 

Infrastructure

40,386

0.59%

 

 

Others *

31,978

0.46%

 

 

Library

27,727

0.40%

 

 

Fleet Services

18,972

0.28%

 

 

IT Services

14,976

0.22%

 

 

Utilities

10,226

0.15%

 

 

Financial Services

5,375

0.08%

 

 

Totals

6,884,556

100.00%

 

* includes: City Clerk, Mayor, Public Health, Cultural Services, City of Ottawa Housing Branch, Long Term Care

 

Future Opportunities for Transit and Municipal Fleet

 

There are a number of opportunities to find fuel efficiencies in the immediate and long-term future in the City’s fleet and these will be explored, as directed by Council, through the review of the Fleet Emissions Reduction Strategy by the end of Winter 2009. In addition, Council has directed staff to return by Fall 2009 with a Green Fleet Policy that will outline changes to the City’s procurement practices and favour the purchase of new and emerging green technologies.

 

In terms of procurement and fuel usage, the City plans to introduce "life cycle costing" which will take into account overall lifecycle costs and not just initial purchase cost.  The life cycle costing method takes into consideration the total life cycle costs of ownership (i.e. depreciation, maintenance, fuel, etc.) of a vehicle in determining which vehicle to purchase.  Using life cycle costing tends to help ensure only fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment is purchased, as fuel is a significant life cycle cost.

 

Municipal staff continually plans, studies, and modifies routes to maximize use of their vehicles and minimize deadheading – ie. SOPs – snow plowing; SWS – garbage collection.

 

Staff are analyzing the results of the Garage Efficiency Study to explore potential benefits of constructing remote maintenance facilities to minimize travel distances to maintenance facilities.

 

In the future, staff will continue to evaluate electric, low-speed vehicles, or hydrogen-fuelled vehicles, for City operations and possibly pilot test these vehicles if the evaluation proves beneficial.  As well, testing of green trucks, including light-duty, medium-duty and heavy-duty vehicles -- targeting those that idle excessively such as delivery trucks and garbage packers will be investigated.   For additional examples of current and proposed municipal initiatives to reduce fuel consumption please see Document 2.

 

Reducing fuel within Transit Services will be difficult to implement due the resulting service reduction, decreased ridership, and reduced revenue. Having said that, it should be noted that Transit Services is integrating new fuel-efficient buses into the OC Transpo fleet by acquiring 202 diesel-electric hybrid buses. 

 

The new buses will be phased in and fully operational by September 2010.  The hybrid buses will result in significant fuel savings.  Using a $1.32 per litre price for diesel fuel and assuming that each bus travels 70,000 kilometres per year, the following estimated fuel savings are anticipated:

 

Ø      2009 (2 hybrids all-year + 95 for 0.33 of year) = $ 760,000

Ø      2010 (97 hybrids all-year + 105 for 0.33 of year) = $ 3.0M

Ø      2011 (202 hybrids all-year) = $ 4.6M

 

The figures indicate that once the full hybrid bus fleet is in service, there will be an estimated annual fuel savings of $4.6 million.

 

Transit Services currently spends considerable efforts towards operational efficiency. On an on-going basis, the performance of all routes is monitored.  Alterations of routes and services are addressed through public consultation, with the objective of creating sustainable occupancy rates on board the buses. Similarly, on-going efforts are spent on optimizing our service delivery model and the proportion of revenue to non-revenue kilometres.

 

To find further fuel savings, Transit Services is lobbying the Province to change existing regulations to allow the use of coloured diesel (diesel used on off-road vehicles such as tractors) in buses.  Such change could potentially produce 14.3 cents per litre in savings in road tax as coloured diesel is not subject to the same provincial and federal taxes on fuel.  Currently, the City is rebated a very small portion of tax (approximately $29,000 per year) but if the recommended change were to occur savings could reach about $5.7 million per year.

 

In terms of ongoing initiatives, Transit Services is implementing a bus plug-in program at the new garage on Industrial Avenue and applies protocols for outdoor bus storage. These practices eliminate the need for buses to idle all night in the colder months, and reduces fuel consumption by 50 per cent by only plugging in the buses two hours prior to their departure.

 

Transit fleet is undertaking a diesel fuel conversion, from No.1 to No.2, which is expected to generate two to five per cent fuel economy.  This conversion involves the reprogramming of some electronic engines for their fuel type. Exact savings are being verified through testing at the National Research Council of Canada and Environment Canada.  Due to engine and emission control technology variations, and climate variations (-35 to +35 C), the testing will provide an approximate fuel economy reduction for our fleet, estimated at $860, 000 per annum.

 

Transit Services has also initiated a tire pressure and temperature tracking project for transit buses that has good potential to ensure bus tires are maintained at proper pressures, not only saving fuel but also reducing tire wear.

 

OC Transpo’s Annual Report includes a set of operational metrics that collectively are designed to increase the overall efficiency, total consumption and environmental impact of transit operations.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Public consultation will be held during the 2009 budget deliberation on any approved strategies to reach the goal of 25 per cent reduction in fuel usage, along with the corresponding service level impacts.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Adoption and implementation of this policy should result in savings during 2009 which may impact future budgets.  It should be noted that many other jurisdictions have introduced fare surcharges to offset rising fuel prices.

 

 


SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Eco-Driving Policy

Document 2      Municipal Initiatives to Reduce Fuel Consumption 

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

As directed by Recommendation 1, staff will incorporate the Eco-Driving Policy into the city-wide corporate policy.

 

As outlined in Recommendation 2 strategies to reach the goal of 25 per cent reduction in fuel usage, along with the corresponding service level impacts, will be referred to the 2009 budget process for public feedback and consultation.  Should any of these options be approved, following Budget 2009, staff will report to the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee on a quarterly basis on their impact.

 

As outlined by Recommendation 3, staff will report back on options to reduce the amount of CO2 gases being emitted by City-owned vehicles as part of the Fleet Emission Reduction Strategy in Q1 2009.

 


ECO-DRIVING POLICY                                                                                     DOCUMENT 1

 


Eco-Driving - Corporate Policy

 

Approved By

Executive Director Business Transformation Services

Approval Date

  OCTOBER 1, 2008

Section

Transportation

Effective Date

  OCTOBER 1, 2008

 

     

Revision Date

 

 

Policy Statement

 

This Policy aims to ensure all City owned, leased, and otherwise operated vehicles and equipment are operated and used in a fuel-efficient manner.

 

Purpose

 

The objective of the Policy is to provide guidelines to be followed that will result in reduced fuel consumption, thereby reducing fuel costs to the City and simultaneously reducing vehicle and equipment emissions such as Carbon Dioxide gasses.

 

Application 

 

This Policy applies to all City employees, hired contractors and volunteers who operate City vehicles and / or equipment.

 

Policy Requirements

 

Fuel consumption is to be reduced by following rules outlined in these two broad categories:

  • Reduction of travel:
    • Before setting out for travel, evaluate options such as can someone else who is going deliver or pick up what you need,
    • Consider non-travel options such as e-mail, fax, teleconferencing or internal / external mail,
    • Plan your route (except in cases where routes are pre-determined and or pre-assigned such as bus routes etc.) to minimize vehicle and equipment use and to obtain optimum efficiency,
    • Postpone required but non-urgent travel to another day where it can be combined with another travel requirement,
    • Use City vehicles and equipment only for authorized purposes.
  • Driving behaviour:

o       When possible, use public transit,

    • When possible, use the smallest most efficient vehicle or piece of equipment available that will do the job,
    • Avoid carrying unnecessary items in your vehicle; a larger than required load reduces fuel economy.
    • Avoid rush hour traffic (except in cases where routes are pre-determined and or pre-assigned such as bus routes etc.),
    • Reduce idling time,
    • Use Air-conditioning sparingly,
    • Avoid Jack-rabbit starts and excessive rates of acceleration,
    • Observe and obey all posted speed limits,
    • Manage your time and space on the road; avoid the need for rapid braking,
    • Report any vehicle defect as soon as possible, many defects, including low tire pressure, waste fuel and may accelerate vehicle wear.

 

Responsibilities

 

All drivers affected by this policy as designated under the section “Application” shall ensure the requirements of this Policy are followed and implemented.

 

Monitoring/Contraventions

 

Supervisors and Managers will educate staff and monitor current practices to ensure compliance with this policy.

Failure to comply with this Policy may result in disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal.

 

References

 

The City's Employee Code of Conduct,

Corporate Vehicle and Equipment Idling Policy,

Discipline - Corporate Policy,

The Ontario Highway Traffic Act,

Personal Use of City Vehicles - Corporate Policy.

 

legislative & administrative authorities

 

City of Ottawa Council, June 25, 2008.

 

Definitions

 

“Eco-Driving” is a term denoting the most Economical as well as the most Ecologically friendly and responsible driving behaviour.

 

Keyword Search

 

Driving

Behaviour

Fuel

Idling

Reduction

Vehicle

Enquiries

 

For further information on this policy, contact:

 

Manager Operational Support and Policy

613-842-3636 ext. 2301

Fleet Services Branch
Department of Public Works and Services

City of Ottawa

 

 

Appendices

 

N/A

 

 

 


MUNICIPAL INITIATIVES TO REDUCE FUEL CONSUMPTION                 DOCUMENT 2

 

Fuel Reduction Considerations

 

City

Propose

Staff minimize and/or consolidate face-to-face meetings @ multiple sites using City and personal vehicles.

City

Propose

Enable technology to allow for web meetings to reduce unnecessary face-to-face meetings.

CPS

Propose

Minimize use of emergency paramedic vehicles for non-emergency situations.

CPS

Propose

Reduce non-emergency use of fire vehicles.

CPS

Propose

Explore the addition of zero-emission ice resurfacers to the City's fleet.

CPS

Currently

Put more police on the street and revise patrol routes to reduce fuel usage and implement the Auditor General’s recommendations on fleet.

a.       Fleet is working on implementing the fleet components of the OAG audit.

 

CPS

Propose

By-Law Officers consolidate transportation needs within geographic zones – less vehicle patrols and increase bike/foot patrols.

PWS

Planned

When acquiring new vehicles take into account overall lifecycle costs and not just initial purchase cost.
The City plans to introduce "life cycle costing" in the vehicle and equipment procurement process.  The life cycle costing method takes into consideration the total life cycle costs of ownership (i.e. depreciation, maintenance, fuel, etc) of a vehicle in determining which vehicle to purchase.  Using life cycle costing tends to ensure only fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment is purchased, as fuel is a significant life cycle cost.

PWS

Currently

Fleet Services Branch focuses on purchasing the right vehicle at the right cost at the right time and will continue to strive and refine its efforts in this area.
The City already requires vehicles to meet stringent specifications to ensure operational requirements are met in a cost effective manner.  This includes specifying fuel efficiency ratings that vehicles must meet to be considered for purchase.  These fuel efficiency standards are based on industry best in class for the class of vehicle being purchased.  This helps to ensure that only fuel-efficient vehicles are purchased.

PWS

Currently

Contain fleet size and purchase fuel-efficient, right-sized vehicles as a standard practice, if they are commercially available and meet operational needs, specifically:

a.       Contain the size of the City's fleet to reduce the number of vehicles required and kilometres traveled, use vehicles more efficiently and delete underused vehicles from the fleet or move them to other City operations;

b.       Purchase the right size of vehicle for the job, using small vehicles where they meet operational needs; and

c.       Purchase the most fuel-efficient vehicle, or lowest-emitting vehicle, that is commercially available and meets operational needs.

PWS

Currently

Pilot test promising green vehicle technologies and work with industry to accelerate development and large-scale adoption in Canada by:

a.       Actively seeking, pilot testing and incorporating green vehicles and technologies into the City's fleet;

 

PWS

Currently

Identify and incorporate equipment and practices that reduce fuel consumption and idling such as:

a.       Procure LED lights, batteries, inverters, space heaters or other equipment that reduces the need to idle a vehicle for long periods in order to operate lights, arrow boards and other necessary tools; and

b.       Install electric plugs for truck block heaters at all major yards where feasible and ensure staff use them efficiently.

PWS

Currently

Explore the cost/benefit of constructing remote maintenance facilities to minimize travel distances to maintenance facilities.

PWS

Planned

Evaluating low-speed vehicles (light duty electrical support vehicles) for City operations and pilot test these vehicles if the evaluation indicates they will be beneficial.

PWS

Planned

Pilot test green trucks, including light-duty, medium-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, targeting those that idle excessively such as delivery trucks and garbage packers.

PWS

Planned

Pilot test hydrogen-powered vehicles.

PWS

Currently

Reducing the road-resurfacing program.

PWS

Currently

Review use of vehicles and operations to reduce fuel consumption.
i.e. SOPS currently spends a considerable amount of effort studying routes in order to minimize deadheading when plowing.


FUEL EFFICIENCY - RESPONSE TO MOTION 39/17

RENDEMENT DU CARBURANT - RÉPONSE À LA MOTION NO 39/17

ACS2008-PTE-DCM-0006                                     CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE

 

Councillor Wilkinson noted the report indicates reducing idling time, however it does not make reference to the City of Ottawa’s idling by-law.  The councillor was also concerned that the report indicates the only way to reduce fuel consumption for the transit system is by cancelling routes and suggested that there are other options that can be looked at.  She pointed out that there are some efficiencies that can be done with some routes, but cancelling them when ridership is increasing does not make sense.  She explained that the intent of her initial Motion was to start looking at not only fuel consumption, but also how it affects the air quality.

 

David Gladstone, Friends of the O-Train argued that the O-Train is three times more fuel efficient then a bus and suggested that if was extended on existing railway lines it would reduce a number of congestion issues throughout the city.  He indicated that the increase in fuel cost is encouraging the use of public transit and therefore, cutting bus service would simply discourage the transit use.

 

David Jeanes, Transport 2000 spoke in detail to the report and the more salient comments noted were as follows:

·        The report refers to the benefits to hybrid buses but does not include any good news stories how the hybrid buses are going to help with fuel consumption.  The National Research Council has done a study of the expected savings, on most routes that use the Transitway and the savings would be minimal

·        the report demonstrates precise fuel consumption for bus transit but only estimated fuel consumption for light rail

·        Federal and Provincial infrastructure funding for transit depends on ridership increase.  Any measure that would reduce ridership would be working against the ability to attract senior government infrastructure funding

·        The report proposes removing all bus service to Riverside South, the same area that the City was going to build light-rail

·        The report should have addressed how to better schedule drivers and buses to keep them moving and reduce time spent idling

·        The O-Train consumes 1/3 the fuel than buses per passenger moved so there could be a significant savings if the percentage of transit passengers moved over distance were to be handled by economical additions to the O-Train.

 

Tim Lane made the following points on how to save fuel:

·        Reduce fuel wastage by having peak hour buses heading west laying over at Bayview, instead of the Pinecrest garage

·        Articulated buses should only be used on routes that have a heavy ridership

·        The new Route 98 route from Tunney’s Pasture to South Keys makes no sense since the O-Train, which is one stop away from Tunney’s, is the faster choice

·        Running a bus straight down Hunt Club Road to the transitway would reduce the congestion at the Greenboro park and ride

·        The report proposes to cut Route 143 which serves the area around Greenboro Station but only comes once an hour; most commuters either walk or drive to Greenboro rather then wait for this bus.

 

Responding to questions posed by Councillor Cullen, Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability, explained that staff will continue to look for ways to optimize bus routes and minimize deadheading.  She further explained that the report uses cost per passenger kilometre because it reflects vehicle, fuel and maintenance costs.  While the councillor found the information helpful, he acknowledged that Committee and Council has no intention of cutting service.

 

Councillor Desroches stated that there is a great deal of support for peak hour routes, but concern has been raised about the frequency of off-peak routes.  He wondered whether staff was moving towards a policy where increasing the frequency will be postponed if the ridership has not reached the desired level?  Alain Mercier, Director of Transit Services explained that the Council-approved policy is related to the impact on ridership based on financial performance; the branch presents alternatives where the system can be strengthened and they can look at the performance of certain routes to identify those that are not economical.  He further explained that the changes are part of the Transplan process.

 

Councillor Desroches asked staff what progress has been made of lobbying the provincial government about the use of coloured diesel.  Mr. Mercier advised that he would be reporting back with more information to look at tax rebates relating to using coloured diesel.

 

Councillor Bloess pointed out that the Committee was looking for ideas and suggestions for fuel economy and he wanted to see more ideas e.g., reviewing routes that are not performing; reviewing the equipment used on the routes, et cetera.  He mentioned that the right approach is to discuss the routes that are not performing and evaluate whether they should be adjusted during the budget process.  The councillor suggested the report should also clarify what fuel consumption is between buses and the O-train, especially when the bus fleet carries more people.


 

Councillor Doucet asked whether there was a single point of contact for energy-related questions from the public and from councillors and the Deputy City Manager advised that there is a group looking at optimizing service and she would report back with a point of contact for questions.

 

Moved by M. Wilkinson

 

That Recommendation 1 be amended by referring to the idling bylaw, to read as follows:

 

1.         Receive for information the Eco-Driving Policy and direct staff to incorporate it into the Corporate Policies, by referring to the idling bylaw;

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

Moved by M. Wilkinson

 

That Recommendation 2 be referred back to staff to continue to look at options to reduce fuel usage without cutting bus routes

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend Council:

 

1.         Receive for information the Eco-Driving Policy and direct staff to incorporate it into the Corporate Policies, by referring to the idling bylaw;

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

2.         Receive for information the implications and potential impacts of the options required to reduce fuel consumption of City-owned vehicles by 25% and refer this report for consideration in the 2009 Budget process;

 

                                                                                                REFERRED TO STAFF

 

3.         Direct staff to continue with options to reduce the amount of CO2 gases being emitted by City-owned vehicles as part of the Fleet Emission Reduction Strategy in Q1 2009.

 

                                                                                     CARRIED

 

 



[1] Revenue (or service) kilometres are the distance travelled by public transit vehicles while in service.