Report to/Rapport au :

 

Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

and Council/et au Conseil

 

9 August 2007 / le 9 août 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : R.G. Hewitt,

Deputy City Manager/Directeur municipal adjoint,

Public Works and Services/Services et Travaux publics 

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : W.R. Newell, P. Eng., Director/Directeur

Infrastructure Services/Services d’infrastructure

613-580-2424 x16002, Wayne. Newell@ottawa.ca

 

Rideau-Vanier (12)

Ref N°: ACS2007-PWS-INF-0010

 

 

SUBJECT:

Cost Estimate for Feasibility study to estimate the impact of permanently reducing the number of lanes on King Edward Avenue from 6 to 4.

 

 

OBJET :

CoÛT ESTIMATIF D’UNE ÉTUDE VISANT À ÉVALUER L’INCIDENCE DE LA RÉDUCTION PERMANENTE DU NOMBRE DE VOIES SUR L’AVENUE King-Edward, POUR LE FAIRE PASSER DE 6 À 4.

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Transportation Committee and Council receive this report for information.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports et le Conseil municipal prennent connaissance du présent rapport.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Environmental Study Report (ESR) for the King Edward Avenue Renewal project, dated September 2002, evaluated different roadway cross-section options including four-lanes and six-lanes.  The conclusion of this evaluation was that a six-lane cross-section is required until measures are in place to significantly reduce traffic volumes on King Edward Avenue, particularly the volume of truck traffic.  Possible measures to reduce traffic volumes, as identified in the ESR, included the construction of a new inter-provincial bridge.

 

Construction of the King Edward Avenue Renewal project commenced in 2005.  Phase 1 construction has been completed and includes a new overpass south of Macdonald-Cartier Bridge.  Phase 2 construction commenced in 2006 and includes reconstruction of King Edward Avenue between Macdonald-Cartier Bridge and St. Patrick Street to a six-lane cross-section.  Construction is scheduled to be completed in December 2007.  Phase 3 is currently at a final design stage and includes the reconstruction of King Edward Avenue between St. Patrick Street and Besserer Street to a six-lane cross-section.  The design and construction of King Edward allows for conversion to a four-lane cross-section in the future.

 

Report ACS2007-CCS-TRC-002 titled "Pedestrian Crosswalk at the Intersection of King Edward Avenue and Cathcart Street", was considered at the Transportation Committee meeting of 16 May 2007.  That report had two recommendations which were carried as amended.  The second recommendation was:

 

"That the following recommendation be referred to staff for cost estimates:

That during the actual construction process, which has reduced the number of lanes on King Edward from 6 to 4, a feasibility study be undertaken to estimate the impact of permanently reducing the Avenue to four lanes."

 

City Council  at its meeting on 13 June 2007 asked that the request for a feasibility study be refered to staff for a cost estimate on the understanding that no funds existed in the project for this work.  This report provides those cost estimates.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

A feasibility study to estimate the impact of permanently reducing King Edward Avenue to four lanes would require extensive data collection and analysis to properly assess the network-wide operational impacts resulting from redistribution of traffic from the Macdonald-Cartier Bridge corridor.  The study cannot be based simply on traffic counts taken along King Edward Avenue during the period while construction activities have temporarily reduced it to four lanes; rather, it must reflect the network-wide impacts resulting from lane reductions on a permanent basis.  This not only requires traffic counts along King Edward and parallel routes such as Dalhousie and Sussex, that serve the catchment area leading to and from the Macdonald-Cartier Bridge, but also counts at key signalized intersections along arterials that serve the catchment areas of the four other inter-provincial bridges.

 

The feasibility study must also consider the network-wide impacts on transit.  A transit ridership study would be required and passenger trips analyzed at each river crossing to be able to compare scenarios where King Edward is permanently reduced to four lanes versus the current temporary arrangement of four lanes north of Murray Street only.

 

All analysis pertaining to redistribution, both in terms of vehicular flows and transit ridership, must attempt to rationalize its validity given the subjective relationship that exists between data collected during temporary construction conditions, versus which would ultimately prevail following establishment of permanent conditions once traffic patterns stabilize.

 

An addendum to the ESR would be required if further consideration of reduction to four lanes is to be pursued prior to implementation of the measures to reduce traffic and truck volumes on King Edward Avenue.  The amount of effort required to prepare this addendum is dependant upon the extent of public participation required to address concerns raised during the study.

 

Based on this the preliminary estimated costs to undertake the additional work is as follows:

 

Feasibility Study                                               $125,000

Addendum to ESR (if required)                         $150,000

TOTAL                                                            $275,000

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

The feasibility study will involve taking traffic counts and carrying out a traffic analysis based upon those counts.  Public consultation is not required to determine the estimated cost of this feasibility study.

 

If there is to be further consideration of permanently reducing King Edward Avenue to four lanes subsequent to completion of a feasibility study, then an addendum to the ESR would be required.  Public consultation would be required as a component of the addendum.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The requested cost estimates to undertake the feasibility study are indicated in the body of this report. As indicated in the previous report (Ref No. ACS2007-CCS-TRC-0002) funds are not currently available to complete this work.