Report to/Rapport au :

 

Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

15 March 2010 / le 15 mars 2010

 

Submitted by/Soumis par: Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe,

Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability/Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités

 

Contact/Personne ressource:  Vivi Chi, Manager/Gestionnaire, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance

(613) 580-2424 x 21877, Vivi.Chi@ottawa.ca

 

City Wide/à l'échelle de la Ville

Ref N°: ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0071

 

 

SUBJECT:

Cycling Safety Evaluation Program - Terms of reference

 

 

OBJET :

PROGRAMME D'ÉVALUATION DE LA SÉCURITÉ À BICYCLETTE - CADRE DE RÉFÉRENCE

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Transportation Committee approve the Terms of Reference for the development of a Cycling Safety Evaluation Program as outlined in Document 1.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports approuve le cadre de référence pour l’élaboration d’un programme d’évaluation de la sécurité à bicyclette énoncé dans le document 1.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

While Ottawa has an extensive and well-used cycling network consisting of both on and off-road facilities, the City continues to strive to improve both the safety of these facilities and the levels of comfort experienced by its users. The awareness of the continuing need for such efforts was highlighted by the early morning July 2009 incident in which five cyclists were struck from behind by a motor vehicle while riding in single file in a marked on-road bicycle lane on March Road. 

The fact that the March Road collision occurred in a marked but non-separated bicycle lane also triggered heightened interest in the potential for new types of segregated bike lanes.  However, the review of collisions records involving cyclists between 2006 and 2008 indicated that approximately 65 per cent of the locations, having more than one collision, are intersections where segregation is not possible.

Therefore, staff is proposing to develop a Safety Evaluation Program that allows an ongoing and consistent annual assessment and prioritization for improvements of the existing and expanding cycling network in Ottawa.  At high-priority locations, a specialized In Service Safety Review is proposed to be undertaken to examine broader cycling safety improvement initiatives.  The Terms of Reference for the development of this program is attached (Document 1). 

As part of the review, the study will research and address the issue of the relative safety performance of, and develop application criteria for, various types of on-road and off-road cycling facilities, including the use of segregated bike lanes.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Terms of Reference (Document 1), in recognizing the intent of Council to improve cycling safety on a citywide basis, goes beyond addressing solely the locations identified through collision records and suggests the development of techniques that would allow an ongoing and consistent annual assessment and prioritization for improvements of the existing and expanding cycling network in Ottawa.

 

Historically, Transportation Safety Audits and Studies were based heavily on identification and mitigation of hazards through analysis of collision records.  However, in the case of cycling safety, relying solely on collision records is not reliable due to statistically insignificant numbers of reported collisions.  Therefore staff are proposing to develop technical tools that would consider relevant operating and collision data, field audit, and user-perceived safety. 

 

The proposed Cycling Safety Evaluation Program, once developed, will be used to evaluate a variety of tools, conditions and cycling facility types and recommend cycling safety improvement initiatives.  Segregated cycling facilities are going to be examined as a possible tool to remediate cycling safety concerns along with other measures. First phase of implementing proposed safety initiatives at high-risk locations will be identified for inclusion in the 2011 draft capital budget.

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The Program will be designed to address cycling safety throughout the City's current and future cycling network as per the Ottawa Cycling Plan and this network includes all rural areas of Ottawa.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Public consultation is not required for the development of this report.  Consultation will be a major component in the development of the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program.

 

COMMENTS BY THE WARD COUNCILLOR(S)

 

N/A

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

If implemented, it is expected that the outcome of this program will be a reduction in liability and legal risk to the City.

 

CITY STRATEGIC PLAN

 

Improving the safety of cycling conforms to a number of strategic directions contained in the City's Strategic Plan such as supporting a healthy and active community, supporting environmentally-friendly ways to move around and reducing the ecological footprint.

 

TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The estimated cost of developing the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program is $125,000.  Funds are available to undertake this work in account 905411 (Transportation Demand Management). 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1    Terms of Reference for the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program

 

DISPOSITION

 

Transportation Planning Branch in collaboration with Traffic Investigations/Surveys group of Public Works will proceed with this project upon receipt of approval by Transportation Committee of the Terms of Reference (Document 1).

 

 


TERMS OF REFERENCE – CYCLING EVALUATION PROGRAM                                                                                                                                                           DOCUMENT 1

 

 

Development of a Cycling Safety Evaluation Program

Terms of Reference

 

1     General Background

Cycling is one of the oldest forms of human transportation. However, while the development of major North American transportation networks after the Second World War led to the deployment of sophisticated rural and urban road networks, these were largely designed to accommodate cars and trucks. Unlike many European countries, which have a long-standing tradition of cycling as an important component of the urban mobility picture, it was not until the 1980s and 1990s that cycling began to emerge as a viable and sustainable mode of travel and an alternative for motor vehicle trips on this continent. Since that time, and particularly in the first decade of the second millennium, this emerging awareness has blossomed into substantive policy commitments by many Canadian municipalities including the City of Ottawa to elevate the priority of cycling as a mode that must be accommodated within the urban mobility fabric.

These commitments have resulted in the development of cycling plans and both on-road and off-road facilities that encourage the use of active transportation. However, while there are well-established health benefits that result from the promotion of cycling as a viable transport mode, it is also a fact – as New Zealand Transport Agency researchers pointed out in a 2009 report on cycling safety[1] - that the risk of having a crash while cycling is typically higher than while travelling as a driver or passenger in a motor vehicle. This is of concern to cyclists, potential cyclists, and organizations and agencies involved in road safety. Offsetting this concern however, is the growing body of new knowledge that is helping to quantify the safety implications of accommodating cycling both on and off the roadway right-of-way. With this improved understanding, new planning, design, and safety audit approaches are being developed that can help improve both existing and planned cycling facilities and properly set priorities for future investments in these important sustainable transport alternatives.

2     The City of Ottawa Context

While Ottawa has an extensive and well-used cycling network consisting of both on and off-road facilities, as well an active cycling community that promotes the benefits and use of this network, the City continues to strive to improve both the safety of these facilities and the levels of comfort experienced by its users. The awareness of the continuing need for such efforts was highlighted by the early morning July 2009 incident in which five cyclists were struck from behind by a motor vehicle while riding in single file in a marked on-road bicycle lane on March Road.

City collision statistics report indicates that in 2008 there were 292 collisions in Ottawa involving cyclists, of which 262 resulted in injuries. This statistic in particular highlights the significant vulnerability of bicycle users in such encounters, particularly when higher speeds are involved. The fact that the July 2009 March Road collision also occurred in a marked but non-separated bicycle lane also triggered heightened interest in the potential for new types of segregated bike lanes.

A further investigation by staff into cyclist collisions between 2006 and 2008 has led to the identification of 28 specific locations at which cyclist fatalities or three or more collisions occurred. These locations involved both mid-block road segments and intersections and some of them had already been identified as priority candidates for cycling safety improvements.

As part of Planning and Growth Management and Public Work comments of Councillor Doucet’s report, staff recommended to Council that a specialized In Service Safety Review be undertaken with a particular focus on cycling safety at each of the identified sites. The objective of this review would be to assess conditions and develop and prioritize cycling safety improvement initiatives for these locations. 

However, after further research and investigation it became clear that while such an initiative would bring substantive one-time benefits to the City’s cycling network, it could also be used as an opportunity to develop specialized techniques that would allow an ongoing and consistent annual assessment and prioritization for improvements of the existing and expanding cycling network in Ottawa. A similar recent initiative is currently been finalized by the City to develop and implement a specialized approach to the annual programming of pedestrian safety improvements at intersections.

This document sets out the Terms of Reference for the development of a Cycling Safety Evaluation Program that would be used for the initial evaluation of the previously identified 28 collision locations and/or locations as determined at project initiation to account for new collision data. It would also provide the foundation for an ongoing annual program of monitoring and network screening of the Ottawa Cycle Network.

3     The objectives of the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program

The primary objective of this work is to respond to Council’s desire to prioritize critical cycling facility safety improvement needs on the Ottawa Cycle Network. More specifically, the study will:

1.      Develop a consistent, technically sound, and defensible technical framework for the assessment of safety conditions on the City’s cycling facility network. The framework will include reviews of all relevant operating data (traffic, speed, volume, historical collision patterns, infrastructure characteristics etc), as well as a field audit component of existing conditions from the standpoint of both road safety and user-perceived comfort and convenience;

2.      Provide suitable technical tools to allow the identification and selection of recommended road safety countermeasures to address the issues identified on both mid-block segments and intersections associated with both on-road and off-road cycling facilities;

3.      Develop a cost-effectiveness or benefit/cost based analysis framework to prioritize recommended cycle network safety improvements for budgeting and capital and maintenance programming purposes;

4.      Apply the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program to the top-candidate sites already identified and/or locations as determined at project initiation and prepare a separate report detailing the findings and recommendations for improvements;

5.      Provide a detailed cost estimate and road map, implementation, and resource requirement plan for the start-up and deployment of the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program on an ongoing annual basis within the operating infrastructure of the City;

6.      Provide appropriate documentation for all aspects of the study and in particular, provide training materials and an initial training component for City staff in the use and ongoing management of the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program;

7.      Ensure that the Cycling Safety Evaluation Program embodies a realistic and practical component of active collaboration between staff and the cycling and neighbourhood communities as part of its overall evaluation methodology;

8.      Specifically research and address the issue of the relative safety performance of, and develop application criteria for, various types of on-road and off-road cycling facilities, including the use of segregated bike lanes.

4     Key considerations

4.1     The need for a human-centered approach

There is a growing recognition that road and cycling facility design must increasingly take into account the perceptual and cognitive needs of their users. The science that supports such efforts is called Human Factors, and it plays a particularly important role in helping understand the driver/cyclist interactions that take place on both road segments and in intersections. Consideration of these interactions has an important impact on safety outcomes and the design approaches that can be most successfully applied in various different situations. The techniques and framework developed in this study must explicitly account for the need for a human-centered approach to the work.

4.2     Recognition of different cyclist skill levels

The type of users that may be expected to use a cycle facility is an important consideration when reviewing cyclist safety. In general, cyclists are grouped into three or four main skill levels. A typical three-level categorization would include:

·         Child or novice

·         Basic competence

·         Experienced

Each of these groups uses their bicycles for different purposes, and the type of facility that is most suitable for each group will also differ. More advanced users can cope with more complex situations. Early, novice, or young users under about 10 years of age will require facilities that are generally separated from traffic to a significant degree except on low-volume, low-speed residential streets. The study approach to the work must explicitly recognize this important linkage between the likely skill levels of cyclists expected to be using a facility, and the preferred characteristics of the facility that should be provided – particularly in any aspects of the work aimed at developing criteria or warrants for specific types of facilities.

4.3     Recognizing the limitations of historical cyclist crash data

In any road safety review process, the collision history is one of the key indicators of site safety performance. However, when dealing with bicycle safety issues, typically the frequency of bicycle-related collisions is sparse. This can lead to three problems:

·         A site with only one or two collisions may be ranked with an abnormally high priority (as other sites may not have any collision history); 

·         Due to the known randomness of collision frequencies, a high-risk site may have several years of no bicycle-related collision events at all, leading to a site with an abnormally low priority;

·         When compared to motor vehicle crash reporting, cycling collisions are generally under-reported leading to potential for statistical inaccuracies.

This does not suggest that cycling safety practitioners should ignore the collision history information that is available at a site since such data can sometimes provide useful diagnostic information and assist in the selection of appropriate countermeasures. However, attempting to apply sparse collision data as the sole index for prioritizing investments may result in a serious misallocation of funding. The techniques and analysis framework to be developed in the course of this work must consider this important reality.

5     The study area

The Cycling Safety Evaluation Program shall be applicable to all of Ottawa’s current and potential future Cycle Network. The initial application of the Program in this study will focus on the top-candidate locations to be identified using most recent collision data.

6     The study cost

The estimated cost to carry out the work is expected to be $125,000 (exclusive of all applicable taxes).

7     The study timetable

The study is to be completed in six months from the initial start date of the work.



[1] NZ Transport Agency. “Cycle Safety: Reducing the Crash Risk”. NZ Transport Agency Research Report 389. October 2009. p.7