PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND STATUTORY

NOTIFICATION POLICY FOR ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS           DOCUMENT 1

 

 

 

2.                  MUNICIPAL ACT - PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND STATUTORY NOTIFICAITON POLICY FOR ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS

 

LOI SUR LES MUNICIPALITÈS – POLITIQUE DE CONSULTATION PUBLIQUE ET D’AVIS STATUTAIRE RELATIVEMENT AUX MODIFICATIONS DE LA CHAUSSÈE

 

 

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council approve:

 

1.                  the process outlined in this report for public consultation and statutory notification where required, for roadway modifications, and

 

2.                  the City’s Delegation By-law in the manner described in this report.

 

 

RecommandationS du Comité

 

Que le Conseil approuve :

 

1.         la marche à suivre énoncée dans ce rapport aux fins de consultation publique, et la communication d’un avis statutaire, au besoin, touchant aux modifications de la chaussée, et

 

2.         le règlement sur la délégation de la Ville de la manière prévue dans ce rapport.

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         General Manager, Transportation, Utilities and Public Works report dated 18 September 2003 (ACS2003-TUP-TRF-0040).

Report to/Rapport au:

Transportation and Transit Committee

Comité des transports et des services de transport en commun

 

and Council/et au Conseil

18 September 2003/le 18 septembre 2003

 

Submitted by/Soumis par:  R.T.  Leclair, General Manager/Directeur général

Transportation, Utilities and Public Works/Transport, services et travaux publics

 

Contact/Personne ressource:  Michael J. Flainek, P. Eng. Director/Directeur

Traffic and Parking Operations Branch/ Circulation et Stationnement

580-2424, extension 26882, Michael.Flainek@ottawa.ca

 

 

 

Ref N°: ACS2003-TUP-TRF-0040

 

 

 

SUBJECT:    Municipal Act - Public Consultation and Statutory Notification Policy for Roadway Modifications

 

OBJET :         Loi sur les municipalités – Politique de consultation publique et d’avis statutaire relativement aux modifications de la chaussée

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Transportation and Transit Committee recommend that Council:

 

1.                  Adopt the process outlined in this report for public consultation and statutory notification where required, for roadway modifications, and

 

2.                  Amend the City’s Delegation By-law in the manner described in this report.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des transports et des services de transport en commun recommande  au Conseil municipal  de :

 

1.         adopter la marche à suivre énoncée dans ce rapport aux fins de consultation publique, et la communication d’un avis statutaire, au besoin, touchant aux modifications de la chaussée, et

 

2.         modifier le règlement sur la délégation de la Ville de la manière prévue dans ce rapport.

 

Background

 

City workforces perform a multitude of work on City roadways of different magnitudes and for different purposes – roadway modifications include lifecycle work, road reconstruction projects, new sidewalks, bike lanes, intersection modifications, traffic calming measures, road widenings, intersection narrowings, traffic control signal installations and other physical changes to the road. Most work on the City’s roads is subject to some form of public consultation processes - from discussion with the Ward Councillor, to broad consultation on specific initiatives, to public community open houses, to working with broad stakeholder groups.  Some work is also subject to provisions under the Municipal Act, which require statutory notice to the public and the provision of an opportunity for affected property owners to register their objections.  This report deals with those roadway modifications that will require statutory notification according to the new Municipal Act and outlines the public consultation process for roadway modifications that do not require statutory notification.

 

The new Municipal Act, 2001, came into force on January 1, 2003.  The new Act has brought some significant changes to the rules with respect to public notification.  This report addresses the following:

 

The closing of a road is the responsibility of Development Services and the process to be followed has been approved by Council as part of the development approvals process.  This was adopted by City Council on July 11th, 2001.

 

A summary of the key roadway modification components of both the former and new Municipal Acts is included in Attachment A of this report as well as the pertinent excerpts are included as Attachment B.

 

Discussion

 

Road Modifications that Require Statutory Notification

 

Prior to the new Municipal Act, statutory notification was required whenever Council was considering “stopping up, altering, widening, diverting, selling or leasing” a roadway.  For the City of Ottawa this meant that the following types of road modifications were advertised:

·         A “significant” change to the right of way.

·         Movements of the curb more than 30cm, or a new curb.

·         Installation of any physical changes to the road layout, such as intersection narrowings, traffic calming measures, lane removals, etc.

 

Under the new Municipal Act statutory notification is required only when Council is considering closing or “permanently altering a highway, if the alteration is likely to deprive any person of the sole means of motor vehicle access to and from the person’s land over any highway”.  This means that statutory notification will only be required for work that will result in the permanent loss of the sole means of access to a landowner’s property.

 

 

Process for Projects Requiring Statutory Notification

 

Where statutory notification is required, persons whose sole means of vehicular access is lost as a result of the roadway modification have a right to object and have these objections addressed by the municipality. 

 

Under the former Municipal Act there were two main requirements that defined the process for objections to be heard.

 

First, there was a notification requirement under the Act.  A mandatory four-week advertising period in order to notify individuals that Council was considering a by-law that will impact a roadway.  Under the new Act, Council sets the notice period requirement.  Council has already addressed this issue when it passed the City’s Notice By-law 2002-522 in December, 2002.  Attachment C of this report includes an excerpt from the Notice By-law.  The following is a brief summary of the approved notice practices for a permanent alteration where access is lost. 

·         Arterial, Major collector, collectors – advertise in daily newspaper two insertions 1 week apart with first insertion appearing a minimum 14 days prior to decision.

·         Local road – community paper one insertion appearing a minimum of 14 days prior to decision.

·         Lane – letter to abutting owners a minimum of 14 days prior to decision.

·         Controlled Access Highway – advertise in daily newspaper two insertions 1 week apart with first insertion appearing a minimum 14 days prior to decision.

 

Second, there was a public hearing prescribed under the Act.  Council was required to hear any individual who applied to be heard and felt that their land would be “prejudicially affected.”  The new Act now clearly specifies who is defined as an objector.  However, no process for addressing the objection has been prescribed in the new Act.

 

Since amalgamation, there have been two main approaches used by Transportation Utilities and Public Works (TUPW) staff to determine if a public hearing of an impending change to a roadway is required.  These two approaches follow the former Regional and former City of Ottawa practices.  Both of these processes adhere to the former Municipal Act but each operationalizes the Act in a slightly different manner.  These differences in approach are largely due to the former wording in the Municipal Act.  The Act was very specific on requirements but was not specific on who can object.  The vagueness of the term “prejudiciously affected” has led many municipalities across Ontario to hold public hearings for all individuals who wish to speak to potential roadway modifications regardless of their particular objection.  This vagueness has been addressed under the new legislation, as described above.

In the former Regional process, a public hearing was automatically scheduled for roadway modifications with no requirement that an individual objector signal their intention to object in advance of the hearing.  This process made it difficult to determine if a public hearing was actually required.  This had several important ramifications.  The Ward Councillor(s) might or might not have been aware that there were objections, the rationale for the objection would be unknown prior to the citizen’s presentation, and the number of affected constituents generally would be unknown.  The Councillor(s), the community and staff were not given sufficient time to attempt a resolution as objections could come forward at the actual public hearing.  This practice led to two particular problems for traffic projects.  First, roadway designs were being revised “on the fly” at public meetings.  Second, there were difficulties in reaching consensus that reflected community desires, Councillor’s issues and staff design issues.

 

In the former City of Ottawa process, an individual was required to send a written objection to the City Clerk in order to register the objection.  This gave the Ward Councillor(s) and staff knowledge of the number and nature of the objections; something that could help Councillors and staff to attempt to resolve the objection.  If the objection could not be resolved, a public hearing at Standing Committee was scheduled and appropriate reports addressing outstanding issues were prepared for Committee’s consideration.  Under the former City of Ottawa process, most issues were resolved in the early stages through consultation and open houses, involvement by the local Councillors, and citizen notification through newspaper ads.

 

These differences in approach may have been reflective of the different portions of the road network that would be under consideration by different levels of local government.  The Regional practices would allow a very broad notification, which is desirable for major collectors or arterials but this practice would not have been required for the former municipalities road network of minor collectors, local roads and laneways.  These differences in the network and the appropriate public notification continue to be reflected in the Council approved Notice By-Law.

 

Since January 2001, eighty-five (85) roadway projects have required statutory notification under the former Municipal Act, and of these, 55 have been the subject of a public hearing.  As a result of the changes in the Act it is anticipated that there will be a significant reduction in the number of roadway modifications that will require notification under the Municipal Act, and an even greater reduction in the number that will rise to Committee as part of the public hearing process.  Under the recommended process a public hearing would only be scheduled for unresolved registered objections that were received as part of the statutory notification.  The public hearing would be part of a regularly scheduled Transportation and Transit Committee meeting and agenda items.

 

The recommended process for roadway modification projects that require statutory notification is as follows:

 

  1. Initial consultation with affected Ward Councillor(s), and where deemed appropriate any individuals/businesses or Community Groups in order to determine the issues and potential objections.
  2. Determine if roadway modification is likely to deprive an individual of the sole means of vehicular access and if so, then public notice as per the Municipal Act and the City Notice By-law will be given.

If it cannot be definitively established whether or not access will be lost, or that no objectors will materialize claiming loss of access then as a matter of policy the public should be notified.  Attachment F of this report contains a sample advertisement.

  1. A copy of the public notification will be circulated to the Ward Councillor(s).
  2. If statutory public notification is given, citizens must submit objections in writing to the City Clerk.  
  3. If no written objections are received in response to the statutory notification, the project officer develops a Short Form Report to submit to the General Manager and the Ward Councillor(s).  The Report would seek the General Manager’s approval to implement by delegated authority.  Attachment H is an example of a high level outline of the Short Form Report.
  4. If objections are raised, staff would try to resolve them, in conjunction with the Ward Councillor(s).
  5. If objections are resolved, the project officer would amend the Short Form Report to include details of the objections and resolutions and submit the amended report to the General Manager and Ward Councillor(s).  The Report would seek the General Manager’s approval to proceed by delegated authority.  The objector(s) is sent a letter acknowledging their initial objection and the resolution.  The letter will also detail the action that the objector(s) must take in order to signal that they do not consent to the resolution.  Objector(s) must notify City Clerk in writing that they do not consent to the passing of the bylaw.
  6. The Ward Councillor(s) is asked to concur with the recommendations of the staff report within five (5) business days.  If no response is received, this will be deemed to be concurrence. 
  7. If objections are not resolved or the Ward Councillor(s) does not concur, a staff report will be presented at a scheduled meeting of the Transportation and Transit Committee who will recommend a course of action to Council on the issue.  The Short Form Report would be used as the report to Committee detailing any objections that were received and resolved as well as the objections left outstanding for Committee decision.  Any proposed design adjustments or options could be included in the Report at this time for Committee recommendation to Council for approval.
  8. Council will consider the Committee recommendations and where it decides to proceed with the road modification, the objector(s) will be notified of Council's decision. 
  9. Council will pass a confirmation by-law following the Committee hearing if the roadway modification is to proceed.

 

A flow chart of this process is included as Attachment D.

 
Process for Projects where Statutory Notification is not required

 

Most roadway modifications are the result of some larger study or conceptual work that has taken place.  If the changes to roadway infrastructure and facilities are anticipated as part of lifecycle programs, traffic studies, area studies, environmental assessments or preliminary construction designs, the current practice is to engage the public and Councillor(s) throughout the project.  Project implementation may take place many months after the design, or conceptual stages are completed.


The level of engagement with the community will often vary depending on the magnitude of the project.  For instance, preliminary designs might be discussed for large projects such as the Castlefrank overpass, whereas detailed designs might be discussed for smaller scale projects such as local road narrowings, sidewalks, bike paths and traffic calming measures.  At these stages, project management staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, would determine how best to engage/inform the community though activities such as open houses, advertisements in community papers, presentations or engagement of community groups, and the ward councillor(s).  This public consultation process will be conducted in accordance with the City’s Policy on Public Participation  in decision making.  The main thrust of these activities would be to determine possible community concerns to proposed work, the ability to resolve these through design adjustments or the need for further consultation and consensus building. 

 

As is currently the practice, staff and the Ward Councillor(s) will work towards resolution of community concerns expressed through the consultation process.

 

The general process for roadway modification used by the Department where no access is lost and NO statutory notification is required is as follows:

  1. Public consultation is conducted according to the City’s policy on Public Participation in decision-making. 
  2. The public is notified that the City is contemplating the proposed roadway modification and notice will be given using the guidelines established in the City’s By-law on Public Notice. 
  3. A copy of the public notification will be circulated to the Ward Councillor(s).
  4. Where concerns are raised, staff would try to resolve them, in conjunction with the Ward Councillor(s), and the project proceeds under delegated authority
  5. If concerns are not resolved the Ward Councillor(s) or the Department may request the issue be placed on Transportation and Transit Committee agenda so that Committee may recommend a course of action to Council on the issue.

 

Key accomplishments of the public consultation and statutory notification process:

 

 

The level of upfront consultation should be reflective of the magnitude of the issue and the likelihood of statutory and non-statutory objections from these stakeholder groups.  This information would be used in a briefing with the Ward Councillor to inform him/her of the staff proposal with regards to this issue.  Specifically, if staff determines that access is likely to be affected then it will give notice according to the City’s Notice By-law, and if no objections are received then proceed by delegated authority with implementation of the project. 


The Project Management Staff should also be able to highlight any areas of concern that have been raised by the stakeholder groups.  This will identify for the Ward Councillor the basis for any potential statutory and non-statutory objections on this issue and the potential contentious points.  At this point staff would be able to determine if the Ward Councillor is supportive of this project proceeding by delegated authority.

 

 

 

A flow diagram detailing the proposed process is included in Attachment E

 

Proposed Amendments to the Delegation By-law

 

On December 18, 2002 City Council approved amendments to the Delegation of Authority By-law, which gave staff limited approval authority for some operational items.  The following is an excerpt from Schedule ‘D” of that by-law which applies to roadway modifications:

 

INTERSECTION AND ROAD MODIFICATIONS

5. The General Manager of Transportation, Utilities and Public Works is delegated the authority to proceed with intersection or road modifications which have been approved by Council in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act and for which no objections in response to the public notice have been received.

 

There are a few items to be clarified within this delegation of authority.  For instance, “approved by Council”, is vague in that it could mean either approval of the budget for that specific item, approval of the design, approval of a specific report submitted to Committee and Council or approval of the overall Program budget.  Furthermore, Council is not required to approve roadway modifications in accordance with the Act.  The new Municipal Act only stipulates that Council is to follow the Act’s notice requirements, which are to give statutory notification when someone’s sole means of vehicular access will be deprived. 

 

In an effort to clarify the approval process and to facilitate operationalizing this delegation of authority the following is proposed as an amendment to Schedule ‘D” of the Delegation By-law.

 

INTERSECTION AND ROAD MODIFICATIONS

 

5. The General Manager of Transportation Utilities and Public Works is delegated the authority to proceed with intersection or road modifications, provided there are no outstanding written objections in response to notice given by the City pursuant to the requirements of the Municipal Act and in accordance with the City's Notice By-law requirements; and the respective Ward Councillor(s) has concurred with delegated authority.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Internal consultation on the process has taken place.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no financial implications that are identified in relation to this process.

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

A.                Summary of the former and new Acts

B.                 Excerpts from current and new Municipal Acts.

C.                 Summary of Public Notice By-law 2002-522

D.                A flow diagram of the proposed process for Statutory Notification

E.                 A flow diagram of the proposed process for Non-Statutory Notification and issue resolution

F.                  Template of Advertisement that will be placed in daily newspapers or community newspapers as well as circulated to Ward Councillor, and Community Groups.

G.                Template of Advertisement for non-statutory notification that could be placed in daily newspapers or community newspapers as well as circulated to Ward Councillor, and Community Groups.

H.                An example of the Short Form Report that will be developed as part of subsequent steps of the process are completed.

 

DISPOSITION

 

That the Transportation, Utilities and Public Works Department implement the process as outlined in this report and that the Corporate Services Department (Legal Services Branch) process the necessary amendments to the City’s Delegation By-law.

 

Attachment A: Summary of Statuory Notice and Objection Process for Roadway Modifications in Former and New Municipal Acts

 

Item changed

Municipal Act 1849

City of Ottawa

Municipal Act 2001

Proposed

Criteria to determine if statutory notice is required

Council is considering stopping up, altering, widening, diverting, selling or leasing a roadway.

·   “Significant” change to right of way.

·   Movements of curb more than 30cm, or a new curb.

·   Installation of roadway modifications measures.

·   Closure of roadway.

 

Council is considering closing a roadway or permanently altering a roadway in a manner that is likely to deprive any person of the sole means of motor vehicle access to and from that person’s land

·   Any other modification that would result in loss of sole means of vehicular access.

Public Notice requirements

Advertise for a minimum of four (4) consecutive weeks

Advertise for a minimum of four (4) weeks in dailies

Council determines form, manner and times for public notification.  (City’s Public Notice By-law 2002-522)

·   Arterial, Major collector, collectors – daily for 2 weeks

·   Local road – community paper 1 week

·   Lane – letter to abutting owners

·   Controlled Access Highway – Daily for 2 weeks

Definition of who may object

Anyone whose land is “prejudicially affected”

Former Ottawa anyone who filed written objection. 

Former Region- anyone who appeared at public meeting requesting to be heard.

Anyone deprived of the sole means of vehicular access to their land

Anyone who is directly impacted and risks the loss of the sole means of motor vehicle access to their land as a direct result of the roadway modification

Process for addressing objections

Council must hear “any person who claims that the person’s land will be prejudicially affected”.  There was no further definition or description of what constitutes “prejudicially affected”.  If individual did not consent to council decision then they could request judicial review.

Public hearings were held to hear objectors and Committee recommend to Council the course of action to follow.

No requirement for a public hearing to resolve objections.  However, delegated authority cannot be used if there are objections.  If the municipality and the objector(s) cannot resolve their differences after 30 days, then the municipality may apply to the Ontario Municipal Board for a hearing and resolution

Objectors signal objection.  Confirm loss of sole means of motor vehicle access.  Attempt resolution and proceed by delegated authority.  No resolution hold public hearing.  If objector will not consent proceed to OMB within 30 days for decision.

 

 

Attachment B: Excerpts from former and new Municipal Acts.

 

The following are excerpts from the former Municipal Act and the new Municipal Act with regards to stopping up or altering a highway.

 

Former Municipal Act 1849:

 

300. Before passing a by-law for stopping up, altering, widening, diverting, selling or leasing a highway or for establishing or laying out a highway,

(a)    notice of the proposed by-law shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks…..and

(b)   the Council shall hear any person who claims that the person’s land will be prejudicially affected by the by-law and who applies to be heard.

 

New Municipal Act 2001:

 

Highway closing procedures

34. (1) Before passing a by-law for permanently closing a highway, a municipality shall give public notice of its intention to pass the by-law.

Alteration of highways

(2) Before passing a by-law for permanently altering a highway, if the alteration is likely to deprive any person of the sole means of motor vehicle access to and from the person’s land over any highway, a municipality shall give public notice of its intention to pass the by-law.

Includes all highways

(3) In subsections (2) and (7), “over any highway”, in relation to motor vehicle access, means over an upper-tier highway, a lower-tier highway, a single-tier highway or a provincial highway.

Variations

(4) The manner in which notice is given under subsections (1) and (2) may be different for different classes of closings and alterations and for different classes of highways.

Registration

(5) A by-law permanently closing a highway does not take effect until a certified copy of the by-law is registered in the proper land registry office.

Consent

(6) A by-law permanently closing a highway shall not be passed without the consent of the Government of Canada if the highway,

(a) abuts on land, including land covered by water, owned by the Crown in right of Canada; or

(b) leads to or abuts on a bridge, wharf, dock, quay or other work owned by the Crown in right of Canada.

Right of access protected

(7) A by-law permanently closing or altering a highway is not valid if it would result in a person having no motor vehicle access to and from the person’s land over any highway, unless the person agrees to the by-law.

Where no agreement

(8) Despite subsection (7), if a person fails to agree to a by-law under that subsection within 30 days after public notice is given of the municipality’s intention to pass the by-law, the municipality may apply to the Ontario Municipal Board and the Board, after hearing the parties, may confirm, vary or rescind the by-law and may impose limitations and conditions respecting the closing or altering of the highway, which may include the payment of compensation to the owner and the provision of an alternate means of access to the land.

 

Notice

251. Where a municipality is required to give notice under a provision of this Act, the municipality shall, except as otherwise provided, give the notice in a form and in the manner and at the times that the council considers adequate to give reasonable notice under the provision.

Attachment C: Summary of Public Notice By-law 2002-522

 

Road Closure/ Permanent alteration if access is deprived to any person

Applicable Section of New Municipal Act

Manner of Public Notice

Contents of Notice

Frequency of Notice

Timing

Arterial

Major Collector

Collectors 

S34

Notice in daily newspaper

 

Location

 

Contact for further information

 

Final date for comments

2 insertions, 1 week apart

1st insertion to appear a minimum of 14 days prior to decision pursuant to delegated authority

 

Local Road

 

S34

Notice in community newspaper

 

Location

 

Contact for further information

 

Final date for comments

1 insertion

A minimum of 14 days prior to decision pursuant to delegated authority

 

Lane

 

S34

Registered mail to abutting owners

 

Location

 

Contact for further information

 

Final date for comments

N/A

A minimum of 14 days prior to decision pursuant to delegated authority

 

Controlled Access Highway

 

S36

Daily newspaper

 

Registered mail to abutting owners

Location

 

Contact for further information

 

Final date for comments

2 insertions, 1 week apart

1st insertion a minimum of 14 days prior to decision pursuant to delegated authority

 

Registered mail sent 14 days prior to decision pursuant to delegated authority 

 

 

Attachment D: Flow diagram of proposed Statutory Notification process .

 

 

Attachment E: Proposed Process for Non-Statutory Notification and issue resolution

 

 


Attachment F: Template of advertisement for statutory notification

 

An example of the Advertisement that will be circulated as notification of project as well as placed in the daily newspapers for statutory notification.

Proposed Roadway Modification

 

In accordance with Section 34 of the Municipal Act, the City of Ottawa is providing notice to the public of its intention to pass a by-law for modifications at the following location(s): 

  • xxxx Avenue, from xxxx Street to xxxx Street  – roadway narrowing for the installation of a xxxx on the xxxx side

For more information on any of the proposed roadway modifications contact (xxxx Division) , xxxxxx Branch , at 580-2424 ext. xxxxx.

 

Transportation and Transit Committee will hear in person or by his/her counsel, solicitor or agent, any person who applies to be heard and who claims that their sole means of vehicular access to their land will be permanently lost and wishes to object.  Any person who wishes to be heard on these matters must contact the City Clerk, in writing, at the address below by (date).

 

xxx, City Clerk, c/o xxx, Coordinator

Transportation and Transit Committee

110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Other Items:

Attachment G: Template of advertisement for non-statutory notification

 

An example of the Advertisement that will be circulated as notification of project as well as placed in the daily newspapers for non-statutory notification.

Proposed Roadway Modification

 

The City of Ottawa is providing notice to the public of its intention to pass a by-law for modifications at the following location(s): 

  • xxxx Avenue, from xxxx Street to xxxx Street  – roadway narrowing for the installation of a xxxx on the xxxx side

For more information on any of the proposed roadway modifications contact (xxxx Division) , xxxxxx Branch , at 580-2424 ext. xxxxx.

 

Any person who wishes to raise objections to these matters must contact the City Clerk, in writing, at the address below by (date).

 

xxx, City Clerk, c/o xxx, Co-ordinator

Transportation and Transit Committee

110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Other Items:

 

Attachment H: Example of possible outline of a Short Form Report.

 

 

Example of the Short Form Report as it is developed:

 

Stage 1 of Report

 

Project Name:

 

Location: (Ward and Intersection)

 

Description of the Work:

 

Description of how access is impacted by this project:

 

Known Issues:

 

Consultation(s) that have or will take place:

 

Stage 2 of Report

Results of Advertising:

 

Current Status:

 

Stage 3 of Report

Decision on Project: